The Rolex Submariner, a legendary dive watch, is renowned for its robustness and reliability. However, even these iconic timepieces aren't immune to the effects of time, and one common issue that arises, particularly with older models, is the degradation of the luminescent material, or lume. This article delves into the specifics of lume issues in the Rolex Submariner 16610, focusing on a 1995 model exhibiting a peculiar "flaky" lume appearance. We'll explore the reasons behind lume degradation, examine similar experiences from other owners, and provide context within the broader discussion of Rolex lume technology and its evolution.
Rolex Submariner Lume Question: The 1995 16610 Case
The core problem presented involves a 1995 Rolex Submariner 16610 with seemingly deteriorated lume. Instead of a consistent, even glow, the luminous material appears to be fragmented, described as resembling "flakes of dust" or luminous material. This is most noticeable on the Mercedes hand, but is reportedly present homogeneously across the dial and hands. This isn't the typical fading or weakening of lume; it suggests a more significant issue with the material's integrity.
This observation immediately raises several questions: Is this a genuine issue with the original lume application? Is it a sign of a possible service issue or a counterfeit watch? Or is it a naturally occurring degradation process specific to this particular watch's age and exposure to environmental factors?
Why is Lume on a Submariner so Weak? The Science Behind Degradation
The weakness or failure of lume isn't unique to the 16610 or even Rolex. The luminescent material used in watches changes over time due to several factors:
* Type of Lume: Rolex has used different luminous materials throughout its history. Pre-Super-LumiNova watches, including many 16610s from the 1990s, used tritium. Tritium, while offering a long-lasting glow, decays radioactively over time. This decay isn't dangerous in the small quantities used in watches, but it does result in a gradual reduction in luminance. The "flaky" appearance described in the original problem might suggest the tritium compound itself is breaking down or separating within its binder, rather than simply decaying.
* Exposure to UV Light: Prolonged exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light from sunlight or artificial sources accelerates the degradation of lume. This is particularly true for older lume formulations.
* Environmental Factors: Humidity, temperature fluctuations, and even minor impacts can contribute to the breakdown of the lume material and its bonding to the dial and hands.
* Age and Wear: Simply the passage of time takes its toll. The binding agents holding the lume in place can weaken, leading to cracking, chipping, and the appearance of flakes, as described in the original case.
* Service History: Improper servicing or the use of inappropriate cleaning solutions during service could damage the lume. While a professional Rolex service should address these issues, mistakes can happen.
current url：https://vnuykg.h359a.com/global/rolex-submatiner-1995-16610-lume-dont-work-14296